Events
Cosponsors
- Columbia University Seminars
- Department of History
- Center for International History
- Blinken European Institute
- Middle East Institute
- Department of Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies
Notes
- Free and open to the public
- No registration necessary
- First come, first seated
- Photo ID required for entry

The idea of a Golden Age is as old as history itself. Many religious and dynastic communities of the past constructed visions of a prelapsarian world. Often times this was central to authorizing the very nature of their own knowledge-claims. As early as the 9th century, for instance, medieval writers and translators in the Abbasid empire considered the sciences of the Ancients – from the Egyptians and Babylonians to the Indians and Greeks – to have been received from some universal, Arcadian past. That was one way of condoning their own translations, and their creative philosophical and linguistic borrowings from foreign texts.
Yet this concept was critically refashioned in the 18th century and after, helping to reshape conceptions of science both within Europe and outside it. The eighteenth century in particular gave rise to new narratives of progress, and helped to rewrite sacred universal histories in Europe themselves. It also gave rise to a new discourse on the power of invention and industry. Saint-Simon and Comte, for instance, constructed universal narratives of science of just this kind. Past temporal and sacral discourses were thus unraveled in light of a new sense of the present.
Just as Europeans began to deliberate the rise of their own Golden Age(s), between the Ancient Greeks, on the one hand, and the "Scientific Revolution" on the other, so too did they also began to construct narratives for the demise of other Golden Ages, such as the Arabic or Islamic, Sanskrit or Buddhist “Golden Ages.” Yet, outside Europe, recovering one’s ancient past also became increasingly important for shoring up one’s place in the new order of civilizational progress. Finding one’s past in the present served as the ultimate means of endorsing what it meant to become modern: namely to return to one’s true origins. European imperialism only intensified this trend, and there were numerous variations upon it.
While Arabic, Turkish, Chinese and Sanskrit scholars constructed their own narratives of civilizational rise and decline, often disrupting Enlightenment narratives of universal history, they typically still cast European science and technology as the final eschaton of civilizational knowledge. This led to a common dilemma. Yet on the question of why these former civilizations had declined, there was vast disagreement. In place of arguments about the lack of a rationalist tradition, ideas of causation or empirical methods of deduction or historical verification, came counter-narratives of moral decline or communal corruption. In this sense, Golden Age narratives could serve as reworked Fall stories on a number of different registers.
Much of the historiography of science can itself be understood as part of the search for a narrative of universal history. As in the past, twentieth century versions of this story saw new narratives come together both for the understanding of Europe’s place in history, and for the contributions of other civilizations or cultures. Take the example of Alexander Koyré who helped to popularize the term "Scientific Revolution" in the late 1930s while supervising Egyptian Ph.D. students in Cairo working on their own recasting of a narrative of the Muslim Golden Age. Indeed, the very beginnings of the professional history of science are indebted to the search for universal narratives. Both George Sarton and, later, Joseph Needham, for instance, helped to cast new narratives for the history of science as forces for the new internationalist humanism and as part of the ecumenical march of progress.
Program
time9:30am EST
Coffee
time10:00am - 11:30am EST
Internationalism
“George Sarton, the Virtues of Print, and the Origins of Progress”
Alex Csiszar
Assistant Professor of the History of Science
Harvard University
“Diplomacy and Historiography: Andrew Dickson White"
Geert Somsen
Senior Lecturer
Maastricht University
Discussant
Steven Shapin
Franklin L. Ford Professor of the History of Science
Harvard University
time11:45am - 12:30pm EST
Cold War Universalism
“Historiography of Chinese Science in 20th-Century China: Science, Nation, and Civilization”
Fa-ti Fan
Associate Professor
Binghamton University
“Benjamin Franklin's 18th and 20th Century Enlightenments"
James Delbourgo
Associate Professor: History of Science and Atlantic World
Rutgers University
Discussant
Samuel Moyn
Professor of Law
Harvard University
time12:30am EST
Lunch
time9:30am EST
Welcoming Remarks by Marwa Elsharkry
time9:45am - 11:15am EST
Oblivion and Progress
“Post-Diluvian Oblivion”
Tamara Griggs
Research Scholar
Harvard University
“'The Golden Age is Before Us': Saint-Simon and the Natural History of Science”
John Tresch
Associate Professor, History and Sociology of Science
University of Pennsylvania
Discussant
Pamela H. Smith
Seth Low Professor of History
Columbia University
time11:30am - 1:00pm EST
Invention and Industry
“Pastoral Productivity: Images of Industry and the Dutch Golden Age”
Lissa Roberts
Development of Science and Technology
University of Twente
"Invention, Mere Imitation and Virtuous Emulation in the Eighteenth Century”
Matthew L. Jones
James R. Barker Professor of Contemporary Civilization
Columbia University
Discussant
Harold Cook
John F. Nickoll Professor of History
Brown University
time1:00pm EST
Lunch
time2:00pm - 3:45pm EST
The Problem of Decline
“Beyond the Golden Age of Arabic Science”
George Saliba
Professor of Arabic and Islamic Science
Columbia University
“On the Global Loop of Scientific Golden Age (and Decline) Narrative for Muslim Societies”
Cemil Aydin
Associate Professor of History
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
“Architecture, Modernity, and Sacrality in India”
Michael S. Dodson
Associate Professor of History
Indiana University, Bloomington
Discussant
Projit Mukharji
Assistant Professor of the History and Sociology of Science
University of Pennsylvania
time4:00pm - 5:30pm EST
Knowledge in China
“Changing Orientations: Perceptions of the Nexus between Knowledge and Antiquity in China, 1670-1930”
Ori Sela
Lecturer of East Asian Studies
Tel Aviv University
“Buddhist Promotion of Science-as-Revolution in post May Fourth China”
Erik Hammerstrom
Department of Religion
Pacific Lutheran University
Discussant
Eugenia Lean
Professor of East Asian Language-Culture
Columbia University
Participants
- Cemil Aydin Associate Professor of History University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Harold Cook John F. Nickoll Professor of History Brown University
- Alex Csiszar Assistant Professor of the History of Science Harvard University
- James Delbourgo Associate Professor: History of Science and Atlantic World Rutgers University
- Michael S. Dodson Associate Professor of History Indiana University, Bloomington
- Marwa Elshakry Associate Professor of History Columbia University
- Fa-ti Fan Associate Professor Binghamton University
- Tamara Griggs Research Scholar Harvard University
- Erik Hammerstrom Department of Religion Pacific Lutheran University
- Matthew L. Jones James R. Barker Professor of Contemporary Civilization Columbia University
- Eugenia Lean Professor of East Asian Language-Culture Columbia University
- Samuel Moyn Professor of Law Harvard University
- Projit Mukharji Assistant Professor of the History and Sociology of Science University of Pennsylvania
- Lissa Roberts Development of Science and Technology University of Twente
- George Saliba Professor of Arabic and Islamic Science Columbia University
- Ori Sela Lecturer of East Asian Studies Tel Aviv University
- Steven Shapin Franklin L. Ford Professor of the History of Science Harvard University
- Pamela H. Smith Seth Low Professor of History Columbia University
- Geert Somsen Senior Lecturer Maastricht University
- John Tresch Associate Professor, History and Sociology of Science University of Pennsylvania